Hellmut Wohl,
Emeritus Professor of Art History at Boston University
I thought when João de Almeida first showed me his drawings, and I
think so even more energetically now that I see them again, that they are
both beautiful as drawings and unique in their response to the forms of
nature. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that they are beautiful as
drawings because of their response to the forms of nature. If I were to
describe or characterize this response the word I would use is tactile.
The most fundamental respect in which João’s drawings are unique
is that they convey a sense of cliffs not as inanimate objects but as living
beings. João’s hand follows and modulates the hollows,
protrusions, and the rising and falling cadences of cliffs as if they were
living and breathing bodies.
|
João Bénard da Costa,
Director of Portuguese Film Archive - Film Museum
On first impression, everything in these drawings is familiar to us. We
recognise the depicted places and objects, as well as light, space and
time. But the more we look at them, the more everything becomes unreal and
phantasmal.
For me, the world of these drawings is a world of concealment and
occultation. Not in the sense that the artist is avoiding what he has
depicted and seen, but in the sense that figures and visions intermingle,
making it impossible to say what is real, more than real or less than
real. Is everything magical or has everything become magical through the
way it was depicted, framed, staged? In these black and white pastel
drawings, the abolition of colour is not due to the materials used
(João de Almeida could have used coloured pastels), but rather to
the fact that resorting to colour would heighten their realism or
unrealism. And these magnificent drawings, while having nothing to do
with realism, have also nothing to do with its lack. They are drawings of
the opposite, in which we are not sure of anything, except vision.
|